Teams

LVTA ORANGE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs LT BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schafer / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Hansell Woods / Kristen Frisch2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJaclin Elkins / Heather Testa vs Janice Mossberg / Stacey Fox4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Rona van Sickle vs Vicky Hadley / Karen Trevino2-6, 4-6
2026-07-09vs FCCC WHITEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Schafer / Nancy Pflughoeft vs KARA JONES / Robyn Brady6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAustin Johnson / Heather Testa vs Jody Wood / Whitney Irvin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJaclin Elkins / Dawn Petersen vs Tricia Diehl / Catherine Orr3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-02vs MLF MAROONSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Schafer / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Wendy Saltz / Shannon Ellis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAustin Johnson vs Alli Lackey3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Petersen / Jaclin Elkins vs Samantha Gallegos / Lori Loeb7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Heather Testa vs Marni Crowell / Corey Green0-6, 0-6
2026-06-25vs CSU GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Schafer / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Kim Jensen / Denise Andrews6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Testa / Cathy Simon vs Katheryn Hill / Tricia Ehrlich1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAustin Johnson / Nicole Warnygora vs Maka Hammock / Teresa Nornes4-6, 2-6
2026-06-18vs TAG TEALLost 13
W#1 DoublesJaclin Elkins / Jennifer Schafer vs Amber Slade / Nikki Ellis6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAustin Johnson vs Arwen Christian1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Petersen / Rona van Sickle vs Michelle Sheets / Janet Crespin1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Heather Testa vs Tammy Morrow / Wendy Chambers3-6, 4-6
2026-06-11vs FCCC WHITELost 12
L#1 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Austin Johnson vs KARA JONES / Michelle Clark4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Warnygora / Heather Testa vs Robyn Brady / Kim McConnellogue2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRona van Sickle / Dawn Petersen vs Stefanie Haines / Tricia Diehl4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-04vs LT BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Austin Johnson vs Laura Powers / Lisa Novacek6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJaclin Elkins vs Paige Kanatous2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Kristen Frisch / Melinda Blatt2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Nicole Warnygora vs Carri Miller / Erin Dirvonas3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jennifer Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Jaclin Elkins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Austin Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Nicole Warnygora
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Rona van Sickle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Heather Testa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Dawn Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Petersen + Lesa Morrill-Hughes3450% games+4.2% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Jaclin Elkins6448% games+2.2% vs expected
Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Jaclin Elkins5350% games+1.3% vs expected
Dawn Petersen + Jaclin Elkins111245% games−1.3% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Lesa Morrill-Hughes4947% games−2.4% vs expected
Dawn Petersen + Nancy Pflughoeft3639% gamesnot enough data
Jaclin Elkins + Nancy Pflughoeft4252% gamesnot enough data
Austin Johnson + Nancy Pflughoeft213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Schafer
19W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Jaclin Elkins
63W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
83W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Austin Johnson
41W–60L career · 6 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Nicole Warnygora
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Rona van Sickle
17W–45L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
3.5
Heather Testa
1W–10L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Dawn Petersen
70W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.