Teams

Nosari/Phelps/MH/LR

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 M LLS (Arkansas)

6 players · average NTRP 4.67 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-16vs Garretson/NLR/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMiguel Romanello Joaquim / Bradford Phelps vs Trent Brandon / Austin Crawford3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChris Nosari vs Luis Tirado0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Praphan / Benjamin Heflin vs Daniel Cornelison / Samuel Moore5-7, 4-6
2024-06-16vs Garretson/NLR/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Praphan / Miguel Romanello Joaquim vs Trent Brandon / Aaron Hudson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWyatt Miller vs Samuel Moore2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Heflin / Bradford Phelps vs Casey Garretson / Austin Crawford6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-06-15vs Garretson/NLR/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMiguel Romanello Joaquim / Chris Nosari vs Casey Garretson / Luis Tirado2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKevin Praphan vs Trent Brandon2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Heflin / Bradford Phelps vs Cole Guy / Samuel Moore3-6, 1-6
2024-06-15vs Garretson/NLR/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesBradford Phelps / Benjamin Heflin vs Daniel Cornelison / Aaron Hudson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWyatt Miller vs Austin Crawford1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMiguel Romanello Joaquim / Chris Nosari vs Casey Garretson / Cole Guy6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 M LLS (Arkansas)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Garretson/NLR/BP40102668
2team3000000
3Nosari/Phelps/MH/LR0421021130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Nosari
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.55
Wyatt Miller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.24
Benjamin Heflin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Bradford Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Kevin Praphan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Miguel Romanello Joaquim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradford Phelps + Benjamin Heflin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chris Nosari
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wyatt Miller
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
4.55
4.5
Benjamin Heflin
10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Bradford Phelps
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
Kevin Praphan
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Miguel Romanello Joaquim
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.