Teams

4-KOrr-CHTC

2022 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Jeanne Beckley vs Diane Werner / Judy Tarlton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-10vs 1-CBobby-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Leslie Morgan vs Susan Fekete / Beverly Broslawsky2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-01vs 3-LPrivalle-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesChrista McGill / Lynn Tomkins vs Donna Ware / Melissa Lutz6-3, 6-3
2022-03-25vs 2-EHoover-YMCAWon 10
W#3 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Jeanne Beckley vs Cindy Rosplock / Barbara Gillespie6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-18vs 1-CBobby-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesHana Mastro / Rita O'Sullivan vs Susan Fekete / Kecia Serwin6-7, 4-6
2022-03-11vs 2-EHoover-YMCASplit 11
W#1 DoublesRita O'Sullivan / Leslie Morgan vs Nancy Draughon / Barbara Gillespie6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChrista McGill / Lynn Tomkins vs Tracy Santrock / Angela Miller4-6, 3-6
2022-03-04vs 3-LPrivalle-HRLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Tomkins / Christa McGill vs Donna Ware / Melissa Lutz5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRita O'Sullivan / Belinda Gabryl vs Kay Mabe / Elizabeth Wyngaarden1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emiko Thomsen
published 4
3.65
Adrianne Leinbach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Christa McGill
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
3.51
Rita O'Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Jeanne Beckley
published
3.38
Lynn Tomkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Sharon Campbell
published
3.21
Hana Mastro
published 3.5
Kathy Orr
published
Mandria Davis
published
Valerie Conklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Tomkins + Christa McGill7649% games−3.7% vs expected
Adrianne Leinbach + Jeanne Beckley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emiko Thomsen
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Adrianne Leinbach
239W–225L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Christa McGill
119W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Elizabeth Keating
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Rita O'Sullivan
85W–123L career · 3 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jeanne Beckley
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Lynn Tomkins
50W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
Sharon Campbell
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Hana Mastro
16W–24L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Kathy Orr
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mandria Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Conklin
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.