Teams

For The Fun of It

Fall Coed Social League · Challenger Social League

7 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-19vs Causing a RacketSplit 22
L#1 Female DoublesLori Hamilton / Christina Snyder vs Anne George / Lindy Irving1-6
L#1 Female SinglesLori Hamilton vs Lindy Irving0-6
W#1 Male SinglesRobb Schotthoefer vs Scott Henson6-1
W#2 Mixed DoublesDevin Lewis / Ann Lewis vs Scott Henson / Anne George6-4
2025-10-18vs Kitt's Fun BunchLost 04
L#1 Female DoublesChristina Snyder / Ann Lewis vs Sarah Leslie / Christina Wiseman3-6
L#1 Female SinglesChristina Snyder vs Christina Wiseman2-6
L#1 Male SinglesRobb Schotthoefer vs Hugh Horne4-6
L#1 Mixed DoublesBritani Kavanaugh / Steve Parke vs Kitt Hawkins / Sarah Leslie1-6
2025-10-18vs Trav's TerrorsLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesChristina Snyder / Ann Lewis vs Alexandra Morris / Michelle Cole0-6
L#1 Female SinglesChristina Snyder vs Alexandra Morris1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Challenger Social League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Robb Schotthoefer
usually #1 Male Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Devin Lewis
published 4
3.46
Britani Kavanaugh
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Ann Lewis
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Steve Parke
published
2.95
Christina Snyder
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Lori Hamilton
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Lewis + Devin Lewis6163% games+9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robb Schotthoefer
99W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Devin Lewis
25W–17L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Britani Kavanaugh
57W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Ann Lewis
34W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Steve Parke
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Christina Snyder
38W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3.5
Lori Hamilton
16W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.