Teams

Wade 65+ 6.0

2025 Howard Adult 65 & Over · Howard Adult 65 & Over 6.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-27vs McKeon - Sons of Forest HillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Litzau / John Ricks vs Robert Seidel / Raymond Lyons6-1, 6-3
2025-08-07vs McKeon - Sons of Forest HillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Litzau / Leo Bruette vs Richard McKeon / Miguel Mendoza6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-28vs McKeon - Sons of Forest HillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesLeo Bruette / Michael Litzau vs Juan Rivas / Frederick Duque6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-17vs McKeon - Sons of Forest HillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Litzau / Mitch Sherman vs Jim Hannan / Richard McKeon6-2, 6-1
2025-06-11vs McKeon - Sons of Forest HillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Russell / Michael Litzau vs Juan Rivas / Frederick Duque4-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs McKeon - Sons of Forest HillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Litzau / John Ricks vs Frederick Duque / Juan Rivas6-3, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 65 & Over 6.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Michael Litzau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Mark Rossi
published
2.71
Chris Wertman
published 3
2.57
David Fontaine
published 3
2.50
Raymond Barry
published
Frank Miles
published
John Ricks
published
John Wade
published
Leo Bruette
published
Mark Russell
published
Michael Chotiner
published
Mitch Sherman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Ricks + Michael Litzau5074% gamesnot enough data
Michael Litzau + Mark Russell314 matchesnot enough data
John Ricks + Frank Miles033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Rossi + David Fontaine123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Michael Litzau
129W–85L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
Mark Rossi
13W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Chris Wertman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
David Fontaine
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Raymond Barry
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Frank Miles
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Ricks
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Wade
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leo Bruette
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Russell
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Chotiner
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitch Sherman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.