Teams

CC Avila Power of Love

2026 USTA CC Winter Adult 40 & OVER · CC USTA 3.0W 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-12vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnita Stohr / Kanako Nakajima vs Leslie Warwick / Janet Glenn6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAmanda Balogh vs Carmen Hernandez6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Marty Nitzberg vs Kathleen Crain / Jessie Mulry4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-01vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynnly Sainsbury / Kanako Nakajima vs Jo Lundberg / Martha Calderon6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMarty Nitzberg vs Janet Glenn6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Brenna Humphreys vs Trish Ross / Heather Harper2-6, 2-6
2026-03-22vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoy Swann / Brenna Humphreys vs Trish Ross / Heather Harper2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Galvan vs Jennifer Manduffie0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLynnly Sainsbury / Kanako Nakajima vs Jessie Mulry / Kathleen Crain6-4, 6-1
2026-03-15vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarty Nitzberg / Amanda Balogh vs Jennifer Manduffie / Heather Harper2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Galvan vs Barbara Babka0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnita Stohr / CoAnn Weil vs Tracy Nelson / Carmen Hernandez7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatricia O'Brien / Marty Nitzberg vs Heather Harper / Trish Ross2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Balogh vs Carmen Hernandez6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKanako Nakajima / Natasha Mercurio vs Janet Glenn / Martha Calderon6-3, 6-4
2026-03-01vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarty Nitzberg / Jennifer Rainey vs Kathleen Crain / Jessie Mulry7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmanda Balogh vs Barbara Babka6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNatasha Mercurio / Joy Swann vs Janet Glenn / Leslie Warwick3-6, 3-6
2026-02-28vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperLost 12
L#1 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Kanako Nakajima vs Ramona Cabiles / Morri Nash3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Balogh vs Jennifer Manduffie6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMarty Nitzberg / Brenna Humphreys vs Janet Glenn / Tracy Nelson2-6, 2-6
2026-02-22vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperLost 12
W#1 DoublesKanako Nakajima / CoAnn Weil vs Janet Glenn / Leslie Warwick6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLynnly Sainsbury vs Carmen Hernandez3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia O'Brien / Stacy Inman vs Kathleen Crain / Jessie Mulry0-6, 1-6
2026-02-01vs CC - LLW - Monarch HarperLost 12
L#1 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Kanako Nakajima vs Barbara Babka / Jennifer Manduffie1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Balogh vs Morri Nash7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarty Nitzberg / Brenna Humphreys vs Ramona Cabiles / Carmen Hernandez1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CC USTA 3.0W 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CC - LLW - Monarch Harper63151228216
2CC Avila Power of Love36121532254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Kanako Nakajima
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.85
Amanda Balogh
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
CoAnn Weil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Jennifer Rainey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anita Stohr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Joy Swann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Natasha Mercurio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Lynnly Sainsbury
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Andrea Galvan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.58
Marty Nitzberg
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.18
Brenna Humphreys
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Patricia O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stacy Inman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CoAnn Weil + Kanako Nakajima8362% games+7.8% vs expected
Marty Nitzberg + Amanda Balogh4547% games+2.1% vs expected
Andrea Galvan + Marty Nitzberg0637% gamesnot enough data
Patricia O'Brien + Lynnly Sainsbury0627% gamesnot enough data
CoAnn Weil + Marty Nitzberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kanako Nakajima
17W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Amanda Balogh
11W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
CoAnn Weil
23W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Jennifer Rainey
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Anita Stohr
35W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joy Swann
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Natasha Mercurio
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Lynnly Sainsbury
9W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Andrea Galvan
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Marty Nitzberg
20W–67L career · 7 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Brenna Humphreys
1W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Patricia O'Brien
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacy Inman
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.