Teams

SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Filicia (2:2)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - Men - 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesJim Filicia / Wayne Chan vs Marcus Presar / Mark Noet6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMichael Vaughan / Jim Filicia vs Jeffrey Felix / Robert Alpert2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJay Federhart / Daron McMillan vs Rich Richardson / Jung Han4-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesJim Filicia / Wayne Chan vs Saeid Baha / Alireza Khansari6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStanford Yee / Jay Federhart vs Jon Doyle / Francisco Flores6-2, 6-3
2022-02-06vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ Reyno (2:2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJim Filicia / Michael Vaughan vs Adam Thompson / Craig Schneider6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJim Filicia / Michael Vaughan vs Steve Carmichael / Eric Straus7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJay Federhart vs Jon Murphy6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Vaughan / Jay Federhart vs Stas Tara / Scott Quintal5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJim Filicia / Stanford Yee vs Praveen Reddy Mallu / Matt DeBeer6-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesJim Filicia / Michael Vaughan vs Derek Clotfelter / Murray Reicher6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStanford Yee vs Emmanuel de Seroux6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesShan Askin / Stanford Yee vs Patrick Stuart / Adam Mezo0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJay Federhart vs Salil Upasani4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJim Filicia / Michael Vaughan vs Mihir Parikh / Kartik Shah6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Wayne Chan
published
3.41
Stanford Yee
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Jim Filicia
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Jay Federhart
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Randy James
published
3.24
Bob Boehnlein
published 3.5
3.06
Gilbert Vasquez
published 3.5
2.60
Brian Burger
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Filicia + Stanford Yee5551% games+11.2% vs expected
Jay Federhart + Stanford Yee2348% gamesnot enough data
Jay Federhart + Randy James033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wayne Chan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Stanford Yee
52W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Jim Filicia
108W–90L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Jay Federhart
45W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Randy James
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bob Boehnlein
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Gilbert Vasquez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Brian Burger
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.