Teams

TTA RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs GPTC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Mead / Andy Roemersberger vs David Junta / Matthew Shafroth7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Lee / Frederick Longobricco vs David Hier / Roy Lipworth5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-20vs TTA GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Mead / Andy Roemersberger vs Steven Allscheid / Kevin Darby7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Lee / Frederick Longobricco vs Randy Bell / Wilco Bos7-6, 6-4
2024-04-13vs CP REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesRich Marks / David Mead vs Gary Beck / Dave Dombrowski3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndy Roemersberger vs Jeff Walters6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFrederick Longobricco / Mark Walter vs Brian Friel / John Randall6-1, 7-6
2024-04-06vs GPTC REDLost 02
L#1 SinglesFrederick Longobricco vs Carlos Hinrichsen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRich Marks / Steven Lee vs David Hier / Matthew Shafroth2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-03-30vs TTA GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFrederick Longobricco / Andy Roemersberger vs Kevin Darby / Wilco Bos4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Lee / Rich Marks vs John Daniel Singaram / Brett Herbert4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Andy Roemersberger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Frederick Longobricco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Mark Walter
published
3.17
David Mead
published 3.5
3.17
Toua Vang
published
2.75
Rich Marks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
John Stegner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Walter + Frederick Longobricco4354% games+7.0% vs expected
Frederick Longobricco + Rich Marks3644% games−5.0% vs expected
Andy Roemersberger + Mark Walter134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Walter + David Mead044 matchesnot enough data
Andy Roemersberger + Frederick Longobricco303 matchesnot enough data
Frederick Longobricco + Toua Vang213 matchesnot enough data
David Mead + Toua Vang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Roemersberger
45W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Frederick Longobricco
85W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Mark Walter
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
David Mead
12W–25L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Toua Vang
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Rich Marks
36W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
John Stegner
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.