Teams

MEMPK MARK

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-27vs GOG CHIACCHIAWon 20
W#1 DoublesBonnie Iten / Rose Collie vs Jill Hoover / Kim Roff6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Shaink / Mary Vanryzin vs Sally Martin / Karen Pennell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs CSRC THORNTONWon 21
W#1 DoublesBonnie Iten / Mary Vanryzin vs Jane Wisner / Ginny Hood6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerry Beutelschies / Marion Nagle vs Carmen Ekblad / Shelly Schmidt7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRose Collie / Anne Mark vs Barbara Hanley / Terry Brunner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-14vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Mark / Bonnie Iten vs Martha Walker / Jenny McCabe6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarion Nagle / Rose Collie vs Julie Sveinsson / Myra Cobb6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Shaink / Mary Vanryzin vs Barbara Divesta / Diann Voos6-2, 6-2
2022-05-30vs MEMPK ARNTZENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarion Nagle / Terry Beutelschies vs Vicki Gess / Erin Contreras6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRose Collie / Anne Mark vs Kathy Rex / Marybeth Ulrich5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCrista Clancy / Allison Johnson vs Dee Donnelly / Carol Lubell6-3, 6-4
2022-05-23vs GOG CHIACCHIAWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarion Nagle / Terry Beutelschies vs Jane Ridings / Denise Farrar6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Mark / Rose Collie vs Kim Roff / Sandy Rousseau6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Johnson / Crista Clancy vs Jill Hoover / Sylvia Passarelli6-3, 6-4
2022-05-16vs CSRC THORNTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Vanryzin / Suzanne Book vs Jane Wisner / Linda Edgar6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarion Nagle / Terry Beutelschies vs Carmen Ekblad / Barbara Hanley6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Mark / Bonnie Iten vs Ginny Hood / Terry Brunner6-3, 6-4
2022-05-12vs MEMPK ARNTZENWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Mark / Bonnie Iten vs Sue Arntzen / Rebecca Cuntz6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarion Nagle / Terry Beutelschies vs Meg Jones / Erin Contreras6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Shaink / Mindy Carroll vs Carol Lubell / Marybeth Ulrich4-6, 6-7
2022-05-02vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Mark / Bonnie Iten vs Caron Dumler / Martha Walker6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarion Nagle / Terry Beutelschies vs Julie Sveinsson / Diann Voos6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAllison Johnson / Suzanne Book vs Barbara Divesta / Myra Cobb6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MEMPK MARK802139139
2CSRC THORNTON44131126207
3MEMPK ARNTZEN3581636246
4GOG CHIACCHIA2681636255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Marion Nagle
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Terry Beutelschies
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Bonnie Iten
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.25
Mary Vanryzin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Susan Shaink
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Anne Mark
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.72
Allison Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Crista Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mindy Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rose Collie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Suzanne Book
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marion Nagle + Terry Beutelschies381062% games+7.3% vs expected
Bonnie Iten + Terry Beutelschies5352% games+3.3% vs expected
Suzanne Book + Crista Clancy2542% games−9.6% vs expected
Suzanne Book + Allison Johnson6349% gamesnot enough data
Anne Mark + Rose Collie1451% gamesnot enough data
Anne Mark + Bonnie Iten404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Shaink + Terry Beutelschies303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marion Nagle
60W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Terry Beutelschies
93W–34L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Bonnie Iten
45W–25L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Mary Vanryzin
50W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Susan Shaink
114W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Anne Mark
20W–33L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Allison Johnson
18W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Crista Clancy
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mindy Carroll
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Rose Collie
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Book
26W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.