Teams

8-SBurger-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-02vs 9-ZRowles-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Schaller / Andrew Hedgpeth vs Tanner Dellinger / Matthew Feldt2-6, 4-6
2024-09-25vs 2-AYoung-EVWon 10
W#3 DoublesGraham High / Liam McMahon vs Dan Dillon / Ryan Boyles6-1, 6-3
2024-09-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Hedgpeth / Blake Jensen vs Rob Lucas / David Jackson6-2, 6-1
2024-09-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElias Peters / Graham High vs David Schumann / Walt Elder2-6, 3-6
2024-09-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Burger / Andrew Hedgpeth vs Akshay Gulabrao / Mayuran Ravindran6-1, 7-6
2024-08-28vs 5-JByrd-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesGraham High / Bill Schaller vs Manuel Mariategui Vargas / Christopher DeFusco2-6, 2-6
2024-08-20vs 7-KRamaswamy-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesBlake Jensen / Graham High vs Kiran Ramaswamy / Sam Kasarla0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Andrew Hedgpeth
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.13
Richard Millard
published
3.10
Elias Peters
published 3.5
2.93
Blake Jensen
published 3
2.56
Michael Berro
published
2.56
Graham High
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.43
Bill Schaller
published 3
2.43
Steven Burger
published
Joonho Oh
published
Trevor Noon
published
Varun Chalasani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Millard + Blake Jensen4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrew Hedgpeth
65W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.21
Richard Millard
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Elias Peters
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Blake Jensen
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
Michael Berro
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Graham High
28W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Bill Schaller
3W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
Steven Burger
10W–27L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
Joonho Oh
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trevor Noon
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Varun Chalasani
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.