Teams

South Shore - Senioritas

Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 Women · 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-18vs Missouri City - Heat StrokesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeigh Hutchens / Michele Thiet vs Patricia Cloninger / Gail Haisten3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTina Bell / Pam Saddler vs Judy Childress / Stacy Rundle6-3, 6-1
2026-08-11vs Missouri City - Heat StrokesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Thiet / Frances MacK vs Virginia Champagne / Rhonda Harrison1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTina Bell / Pam Saddler vs JoAnn McCrobie / Stacy Rundle6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnatalia Felan / Laura Bradley vs Patricia Cloninger / Gail Haisten5-7, 3-6
2026-08-04vs Missouri City - Heat StrokesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMonica Parzinger / Pam Saddler vs Debra Jones / Donna Taylor6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTina Bell / Frances MacK vs Judy Childress / Sandy Badeaux6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Bridges / Barbie Wilcock vs Rhonda Harrison / Virginia Champagne6-4, 7-5
2026-07-28vs Missouri City - Heat StrokesLost 12
W#1 DoublesPam Saddler / Monica Parzinger vs Judy Childress / Debbie Jacobson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Maier / Linda Bridges vs Stacy Rundle / JoAnn McCrobie2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLeigh Hutchens / Anatalia Felan vs Gail Haisten / Patricia Cloninger2-6, 1-6
2026-07-21vs Missouri City - Heat StrokesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Bell / Michele Thiet vs Sandy Badeaux / Debbie Jacobson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnatalia Felan / Barbie Wilcock vs Patricia Cloninger / Donna Taylor4-6, 3-6
2026-07-15vs Missouri City - Heat StrokesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPam Saddler / Monica Parzinger vs Judy Childress / Stacy Rundle6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Thiet / Linda Bridges vs Gail Haisten / JoAnn McCrobie2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Missouri City - Heat Strokes5110816147
2South Shore - Senioritas1581022170
3prior to 6-26000000
4after 6-26000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Tina Bell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Monica Parzinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Pam Saddler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Anatalia Felan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Linda Bridges
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Frances MacK
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Barbie Wilcock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Michele Thiet
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Saddler + Anatalia Felan3444% games−4.7% vs expected
Michele Thiet + Pam Saddler1536% gamesnot enough data
Monica Parzinger + Pam Saddler4261% gamesnot enough data
Pam Saddler + Tina Bell2349% gamesnot enough data
Pam Saddler + Linda Bridges044 matchesnot enough data
Anatalia Felan + Barbie Wilcock033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Bell
7W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Monica Parzinger
45W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Pam Saddler
21W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Anatalia Felan
9W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
Linda Bridges
3W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Frances MacK
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Barbie Wilcock
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Thiet
6W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.