Teams

3-JRobinson-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-02vs 7-MLong-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTracey Maurer / Joyce Robinson vs Lynda Noga / Jacqueline Yurkovich6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMillie Hunter / Connie Brown vs Susana Harvey / Colleen Davis0-6, 3-6
2024-09-30vs 4-KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoyce Robinson / Tracey Maurer vs Alana Argersinger / Kim McWhorter6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Hsu / Rebecca Walsh vs Mary Susan Easterling / Cecily Peterson6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Travis / Millie Hunter vs Hadley Nixon / Melinda Duncker4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-23vs 2-JOgle-CCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKrissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer vs Jennifer Ogle / Nancy Sickel6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAbigail Hatcher / Millie Hunter vs Beth Angle / Lisa Johnson6-3, 6-3
2024-09-09vs 1-SSmith-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMillie Hunter / Kelly Travis vs Thekla Pappas / Elizabeth Albright6-3, 6-2
2024-09-04vs 7-MLong-ENOWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Hsu / Abigail Hatcher vs Mary T Long / Lynda Noga6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracey Maurer / Rebecca Walsh vs Donna Holtaway / Terry Friddle6-4, 7-6
2024-08-26vs 5-DRoach-CHCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Hsu / Tracey Maurer vs Deon Roach / Jane Holroyd6-3, 6-1
2024-08-19vs 6-KCarson-UNCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKrissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer vs Amy Tiemann / Amy Hoots6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMillie Hunter / Abigail Hatcher vs Patty Hubbard / LAURIE KIEFFER6-3, 7-6
2024-08-05vs 4-KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMillie Hunter / Tracey Maurer vs Alana Argersinger / Cecily Peterson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Joyce Robinson
published
3.41
Abigail Hatcher
published 3.5
3.39
Tracey Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Krissy Anderson
published
3.20
Kelly Travis
published
3.18
Lisa Hsu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Millie Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Robinson + Tracey Maurer6365% games+7.3% vs expected
Lisa Hsu + Tracey Maurer5451% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Travis + Abigail Hatcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Robinson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Abigail Hatcher
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Tracey Maurer
85W–62L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Krissy Anderson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Kelly Travis
20W–25L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Hsu
91W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Millie Hunter
64W–65L career · 6 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.