Teams

Em.Perry18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-18vs El.Hodges18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / HEATHER WATERS vs Elizabeth Hodges / Jamie Breunig6-1, 6-2
2025-05-04vs He.Remley18A5.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Sarah Barnhill vs Jennifer McEntee / Paula Fernandez-Pita6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-27vs El.Hodges18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesBonnie Stabler / Kathie Stronach vs Laura Alvarez / Ivette Duran6-1, 6-2
2025-04-13vs He.Remley18A5.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Perry / Jeni Burnette vs Carrie Perkis / Brandy Kmiec6-2, 6-1
2025-04-06vs El.Hodges18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Emily Perry vs Paula Collado Cordon / Ivette Duran6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-23vs He.Remley18A5.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Emily Perry vs Nena Marks / Mia Caruana7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / MacY Fisher vs Heather Remley / Dawn Kitner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-02vs He.Remley18A5.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Emily Perry vs Anastasiya Manet / Brandy Kmiec7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Barnhill / Kelly Moler Glass vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Dawn Kitner6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Jeni Burnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.79
Alice Stubbs
published 5
4.73
Anne Frautschi
published 5
4.64
Bonnie Stabler
published 5
4.63
Kelly Moler Glass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.61
Emily Perry
published
4.60
Sarah Barnhill
published
4.42
Kathie Stronach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Neal Goodwin
published
4.26
MacY Fisher
published
Karen Rothschild
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeni Burnette + Emily Perry7266% games+1.8% vs expected
Emily Perry + Alice Stubbs314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jeni Burnette
52W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.96
5
Alice Stubbs
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Anne Frautschi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.73
5
Bonnie Stabler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.64
5
Kelly Moler Glass
69W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
Emily Perry
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Sarah Barnhill
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Kathie Stronach
76W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%27%
4.42
Neal Goodwin
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.39
MacY Fisher
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.26
Karen Rothschild
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.