Teams

4-BGarrison-YMCA-Mixed

2022 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Mixed 7.0 Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-31vs 6-ELinnander-SVCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoselyn McDonald / Tanner Dellinger vs Anne Stephens / John Stephens5-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesConner Garrison / Kristie Elliott vs Allison Stewart-Smull / Thomas Granado6-3, 7-6
2022-07-22vs 3-TBrooks-Eno-18+ 7.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Emma Gould vs Traci Brooks / Frederick Holding4-5
L#3 DoublesOwen Daly / Kristie Elliott vs Angela Baxley / Ben Desonglo0-6, 3-6
2022-07-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoselyn McDonald / Tanner Dellinger vs Carlye Gates / Justin Frye3-6, 2-6
2022-06-21Won 20
W#1 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Joselyn McDonald vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesConner Garrison / Kristie Elliott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-09vs 6-ELinnander-SVCLost 01
L#1 DoublesConner Garrison / Kristie Elliott vs John Stephens / Anne Stephens3-6, 4-6
2022-05-31vs 5-LStanek-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Caroline Yu vs Douglas Norry / Carrie Norry4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult Mixed 7.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.66
Conner Garrison
published 4
3.62
Mark Petersen
published
3.60
Kevin Moyung
published 4
Kristie Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Tanner Dellinger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Rice
published 3.5
3.12
Emma Gould
published 3.5
Alphonso Donaldson
published
Owen Daly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Moyung + Caroline Yu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Yu
27W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Conner Garrison
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Mark Petersen
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Kevin Moyung
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Kristie Elliott
24W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Tanner Dellinger
37W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carrie Rice
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Emma Gould
9W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Alphonso Donaldson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jacqueline Yurkovich
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Owen Daly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.