Teams

RCC Ames

2024 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-04vs Burkwood PoehlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarykay Stainback / Michele Riedel vs Virginia Bowie / Frances Poehler6-1, 7-5
2024-05-31vs MTC GilfillanWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Riedel / Marykay Stainback vs Penelope Dimartino / Carol Beth Cook7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-10vs Stonehenge SnavelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Michele Riedel vs Susan Burns / Cheryl Cacciotti6-1, 6-0
2024-04-19vs Westwood SmithWon 10
W#3 DoublesLinda Ramsey / Michele Riedel vs Dianne Dementi / Diane Jain6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Michele Riedel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Annie H Johnson
published 3.5
3.30
Diana Dull
published 3.5
3.28
Kathy Ames
published
3.23
Betsy Siewers
published 3.5
3.12
Sheri Carlyle
published
2.96
Mary Tankersley
published
2.90
Kumiko Suzuki
published
Linda Battle
published
Linda Ramsey
published
Marykay Stainback
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michele Riedel
71W–114L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Annie H Johnson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Diana Dull
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Kathy Ames
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Betsy Siewers
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Sheri Carlyle
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
Mary Tankersley
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kumiko Suzuki
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
Linda Battle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Ramsey
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marykay Stainback
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.