Teams

SGoins/AHewitt (Carmel)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-10vs LGrant (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMandi Mohammed / Julie Clements vs Diane Smith / Joanne Lindley5-7, 6-7
2023-04-26vs DShealy/TRand (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMandi Mohammed vs TARA RAND2-6, 0-6
2023-04-18vs BTobia (Brookhaven )Won 20
W#1 SinglesJen Dauska vs Laura Hunter6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMandi Mohammed / Ashley Hewitt vs Kimberly Stafford / Julie Strack7-5, 6-3
2023-03-22vs CDewaele (Springfield)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Hewitt / Jen Dauska vs Krista Stewart / Julie Richardson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-09vs NLove/NKoesel (Raintree)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Goins / Jen Dauska vs Niki Koesel / Tricia Shaw6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMandi Mohammed / Debbie Porter vs Elizabeth Harvey / Margaret Flores6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Melanie Carroll
published
3.22
Jen Dauska
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Mandi Mohammed
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.83
Maureen Hussey
published
2.83
2.74
Julie Clements
published
2.67
Casey Fuller
published 3
2.64
PerMar Olin
published
2.54
Abbie Dougherty
published 3
2.50
Geralyn McCourt
published
2.43
Debbie Porter
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandi Mohammed + Jen Dauska5072% gamesnot enough data
PerMar Olin + Casey Fuller123 matchesnot enough data
Casey Fuller + Debbie Porter123 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Carroll + Mandi Mohammed213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Carroll
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jen Dauska
42W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Mandi Mohammed
43W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Maureen Hussey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.83
3
Catherine Mclester
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Julie Clements
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Casey Fuller
6W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
PerMar Olin
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Abbie Dougherty
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Geralyn McCourt
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Debbie Porter
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.