Teams

DTC TEAL

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs GTC GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Miller / Heather Reimann vs Rachael Costain / Teresa Crane7-5, 6-4
2023-07-11vs MC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Reimann / Lindsay Morgan vs Victoria Barstow / Martha Peck6-3, 6-4
2023-07-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Miller / Heather Reimann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-27vs NJ REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebbie Trewitt / Michelle Miller vs Victoria Bull / Crystal Campbell Messer6-0, 6-0
2023-06-20vs JCC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Debbie Trewitt vs Julie Lang / Clare Morey6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs MC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Miller / Debbie Trewitt vs Kim Grogan / Karen Payne6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
Diana Solanki
published 5
4.60
Katherine Nicolson
published
4.48
Debbie Trewitt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.43
Kara Gerczynski
published
4.43
Jenny Wiens
published
4.37
Gloria Gonzalez
published
4.31
Juliana Okulski
published
4.28
Heather Reimann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Stephanie Zaitz
published
3.83
Anna Reed
published 4.5
3.29
Lindsay Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Wiens + Katherine Nicolson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Diana Solanki
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.60
Katherine Nicolson
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Debbie Trewitt
50W–18L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
4.48
Kara Gerczynski
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
Jenny Wiens
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
Gloria Gonzalez
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
4.37
Juliana Okulski
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Heather Reimann
61W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
Stephanie Zaitz
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Anna Reed
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.83
Lindsay Morgan
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.