Teams

Gilbert's Girls

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Grayson Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Abigail Cupper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-08-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrayson Dempsey / Rachel Young vs Alex Jones / Milla Woller6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrayson Dempsey / Abigail Cupper vs Milenka Coltman / Nancy Yen Shipley6-0, 6-3
2024-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrayson Dempsey / Rachel Young vs Teufelin Traylen / Sarah Larson6-2, 6-3
2024-07-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAbigail Cupper / Grayson Dempsey vs Sarah Shin / Cynthia Novac-Yu6-3, 6-3
2024-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbigail Cupper / Grayson Dempsey vs Erin Keyser / MICHELLE LY6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Young / Grayson Dempsey vs Andrea Bailey / Michelle Roach5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrayson Dempsey / Neisa Dokken vs Jean Schnadig / Jane King Ayers6-3, 7-6
2024-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrayson Dempsey / Rachel Young vs Sarah Cariaga / Lori Peterson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Grayson Dempsey
40W–39L career
0%96%4%
2.86
3
Abigail Cupper
42W–17L career
2%93%5%
2.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.