Teams

CCV DeLacey

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level Weekday 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.06 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-12vs Westwood HauseLost 01
L#1 DoublesMindy Angel / Kimberly Brewer vs Megan Alwine / Sarah Oatts3-6, 0-6
2025-09-05vs KRA Ace Ace Baby WalekWon 10
W#1 DoublesLucy Davis / Beth Robbins vs Emily Edens / Whitney Sandridge5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-29vs Salisbury - OtooleWon 10
W#1 DoublesMindy Angel / Lucy Davis vs Tamara Beck Jacquet / Melissa O'Toole6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMindy Angel / Beth Robbins vs Gena Burr / Darlene Moehling6-4, 6-2
2025-08-01vs KRA Ace Ace Baby WalekLost 01
L#1 DoublesKirkland Hagerty / Beth Robbins vs Lauren Hauk / Katherine Shiveley4-6, 2-6
2025-07-25vs Salisbury - OtooleWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Robbins / Katie Willett vs Tamara Beck Jacquet / Suzanna King6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weekday 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Lucy Davis
published
4.16
Beth Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Kimberly Brewer
published
4.13
Kirkland Hagerty
published
4.01
Megan Hodges
published
4.00
3.96
Katie Willett
published
3.92
Mindy Angel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Kerry DeLacey
published 4
3.76
Courtney Harper
published 4
3.75
Karen Williamson
published
3.71
Emily Gottwald
published
3.63
3.59
Anne Henry
published 4.5
3.52
Abigail Fishero
published 3.5
3.23
Lia Mooney
published
3.16
Shula Good
published
Kim Cressy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abigail Fishero + Cary Campbell-Knight404 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Benevento + Megan Hodges404 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Harper + Karen Williamson213 matchesnot enough data
Lia Mooney + Abigail Fishero123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Davis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Beth Robbins
48W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Kimberly Brewer
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
Kirkland Hagerty
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Megan Hodges
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Catherine Benevento
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Katie Willett
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
4.5
Mindy Angel
54W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.92
4
Kerry DeLacey
142W–100L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Courtney Harper
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Karen Williamson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Emily Gottwald
19W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
3.5
Cary Campbell-Knight
17W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
4.5
Anne Henry
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
3.5
Abigail Fishero
22W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Lia Mooney
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Shula Good
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Kim Cressy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.