Teams

Polk/Edwards

2026 Polk Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-02vs Beerman - G. WoodWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Knapp / Susan Jantomaso vs Kathy Baird / Bettye Sykes7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRebecca Pate / Elizabeth Stevenson vs Lizbeth Engle / Elizabeth Willers6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJackie Edwards / Michelle Kilcher vs Gretchen Wood / Ann Marie Toney2-6, 3-6
2026-03-26vs Beerman - G. WoodWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Saltman / Sonya Braudway vs Angela Johnson / Kathy Borders6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSharon Lockwood / Susan Jantomaso vs Kathy Baird / Bettye Sykes1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Edwards / Elizabeth Stevenson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-13vs Beerman - G. WoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Stevenson / Susan Jantomaso vs Angela Johnson / Bettye Sykes6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Pate / Nadine Pantano vs Shelley Robinson / Ann Rainer6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDenise Saltman / Sonya Braudway vs Ann Marie Toney / Kathy Borders7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-05vs Beerman - G. WoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Knapp / Nadine Pantano vs Kathy Baird / Gretchen Wood2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Edwards / Michelle Kilcher vs Lizbeth Engle / Shelley Robinson3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRebecca Pate / Sharon Lockwood vs Elizabeth Willers / Ann Rainer6-1, 6-3
2026-02-26vs Beerman - G. WoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Pate / Michelle Kilcher vs Kathy Baird / Gretchen Wood2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Edwards / Nadine Pantano vs Elizabeth Willers / Lizbeth Engle6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDenise Saltman / Elizabeth Stevenson vs Angela Johnson / Tina Elortegui6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Elizabeth Stevenson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
Nadine Pantano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Denise Saltman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Kim Knapp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Rebecca Pate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Jackie Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Susan Jantomaso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Sonya Braudway
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Kilcher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Lockwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Saltman + Sonya Braudway224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Pate + Jackie Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Pate + Denise Saltman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Stevenson
13W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Nadine Pantano
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Denise Saltman
159W–134L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kim Knapp
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Rebecca Pate
21W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Jackie Edwards
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
Susan Jantomaso
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
Sonya Braudway
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.33
Michelle Kilcher
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Lockwood
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.