Teams

FREMONT TC CW7.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-24vs OSAGE PK CW7.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Parent / Snjezana Maric vs Katherine Ryan / Sarah Shapiro4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSwina Sapkota / Diem Nguyen vs Marci Dublin / Lang Lindsay5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMargaret Gally / Jett Koketsu vs Megan Kovacs / Trish Nornhold3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Aparna Reddy
published 4
3.57
Yemia Hashimoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Rita Sandhu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Snjezana Maric
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Diem Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Beth Parent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jett Koketsu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Rita Kerwin
published
3.21
Kathy Mertens
published
3.20
Swina Sapkota
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Diane Bauman
published 3.5
Karina Sapkota
published
Margaret Gally
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Swina Sapkota + Diem Nguyen9355% games+4.5% vs expected
Rita Sandhu + Jett Koketsu4443% games−1.8% vs expected
Snjezana Maric + Yemia Hashimoto044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aparna Reddy
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Yemia Hashimoto
37W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Rita Sandhu
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Snjezana Maric
18W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Diem Nguyen
26W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Beth Parent
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jett Koketsu
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Rita Kerwin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kathy Mertens
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Swina Sapkota
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Diane Bauman
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Jayashri Viswanathan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karina Sapkota
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Gally
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.