Teams

YMCA PRESIDIO CM6.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 6.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-02vs GOLDMAN TC CM6.5BLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Mueller / Andrea Rossi vs Wonjae Lee / Seokyoung Choi4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristopher Jackson / Kirk Mountain vs Yong Suk Kwon / Changhoon Cho2-6, 4-6
2025-10-30vs MARIN CC CM6.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Redfern / BRIAN Endres vs Gregg Bernier / Jared Caldwell7-5, 6-4
2025-10-11vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC CM6.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Pinto / Michael Regan vs Brian Gomola / David Fuller2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeeran Rajasekaran / Clint Shannon vs Eldon Young / Tom Januario4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Mueller / Guillaume Le Treut vs Robb Young / Samuel Reamer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-05vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC CM6.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesBart Schachter / Noah Diaz vs Trey Sides / Tony Huynh3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Mueller / David Tang vs Sherman Lee / Robb Young4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBlaise Novakovic / Keeran Rajasekaran vs Duy Do / Jong-Chyi Su2-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs MARIN CC CM6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Redfern / BRIAN Endres vs John Buscaglia / Marco Crolla6-4, 6-2
2025-09-20vs GOLDMAN TC CM6.5BLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexander Steck / William Foley vs Hyoungin Kwon / Matthias Schmidt3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Jackson / Blaise Novakovic vs Seokyoung Choi / Romain le Picard0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChico Myers / Frank Zawilla vs Donghoon Shin / Michael Li1-6, 2-6
2025-09-14vs GOLDMAN TC CM6.5BLost 12
L#1 DoublesLawrence Henriquez / BRIAN Endres vs Young Min Kim / Donghoon Shin0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBart Schachter / Kirk Mountain vs Michael Li / Matthias Schmidt3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHarry Wang / Ananth Varma vs Wonjae Lee / Injun Seh6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-07vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC CM6.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Pinto / Guillaume Le Treut vs Jong-Chyi Su / Robb Young6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOsman Baskaya / Noah Diaz vs Kyle Du / Jonathan Vuong1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesScott Howard / William Foley vs David Fuller / Eldon Young4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Sumedh Inamdar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Lawrence Henriquez
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
John Pinto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Alexander Steck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bart Schachter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
William Foley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Andrea Rossi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
BRIAN Endres
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Chico Myers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ananth Varma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Frank Zawilla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Blaise Novakovic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Clint Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Guillaume Le Treut
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keeran Rajasekaran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kirk Mountain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Regan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Noah Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Osman Baskaya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sumedh Inamdar
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Lawrence Henriquez
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
John Pinto
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Alexander Steck
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bart Schachter
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Foley
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Andrea Rossi
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
BRIAN Endres
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Chico Myers
3W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Ananth Varma
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Frank Zawilla
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Blaise Novakovic
1W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Clint Shannon
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Guillaume Le Treut
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keeran Rajasekaran
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kirk Mountain
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Mueller
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Regan
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Noah Diaz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Osman Baskaya
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.