Teams

Ben's Team

2022 Corpus Christi 18 & Over USTA League · Mens 4.5 Flight

11 players · average NTRP 4.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBen Jackson / Dan McBurney vs Matthew Heeder / Michael Hogan6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesBen Jackson / Daniel Neuman vs Michael Hogan / Jake Garcia6-2, 6-2
2022-04-28vs The BroskisWon 10
W#1 DoublesBen Jackson / Daniel Neuman vs Angel Rios / Ruben Herrera6-4, 6-4
2022-04-14vs The BroskisLost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Mcburney / Ben Jackson vs Michael Dudley / Michael Hogan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBen Jackson / Julius Cortez vs Matthew Heeder / Ruben Herrera5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 4.5 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Jimmy Lawless
published
4.34
Ben Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.33
Jonathan Hartwell
published
Connor Crumly
published 4.5
4.19
Darryl Moore
published 4.5
4.19
Julius Cortez
published
4.18
Mike Mcburney
published
4.11
Delfino Morales Jr
published 4.5
4.01
Michael Ortiz
published
3.93
Dan McBurney
published 4
3.87
Ronald Elizondo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julius Cortez + Ben Jackson5072% gamesnot enough data
Mike Mcburney + Jonathan Hartwell404 matchesnot enough data
Jimmy Lawless + Mike Mcburney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jimmy Lawless
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.50
4.5
Ben Jackson
109W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
Jonathan Hartwell
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Connor Crumly
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Darryl Moore
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Julius Cortez
22W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
Mike Mcburney
20W–9L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Delfino Morales Jr
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Michael Ortiz
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.01
4
Dan McBurney
57W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
Ronald Elizondo
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.