Teams

Delk - Pinehurst Resort

Sandhills Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Combo Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Vaughan - CCNCLost 02
L#2 DoublesLori Copper / Kris Downing vs Christina Powers / Courtney McGuirt5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Eileen Carter vs Katherine Melvin / Caroline Parks5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-20vs Roach - Pinehurst ResortWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Kirkwood / Nannette Goodwin vs Theresa Roach / Annmarie Anderson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMia Delk / Laura Davidson vs Jill Patton / Ellen Harris4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Copper / Kris Downing vs Lynne Beechler / Katie Sherron6-3, 6-0
2026-08-13vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Mia Delk vs Joy Martin / Susi Tarvis6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLori Copper / Ellen Frazer vs Katrina Bullard / Amity Aldridge6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Kirkwood / Lily Li vs Ann Tucker / Del Metcalf2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Nannette Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Stacey Heisler
published 4
3.48
Ellen Frazer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Mary Bonsall
published
3.37
Lisa Kirkwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Mia Delk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Eileen Carter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Kris Downing
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Elizabeth Webster
published
Lori Copper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Delk + Eileen Carter6262% games+8.4% vs expected
Eileen Carter + Nannette Goodwin2357% gamesnot enough data
Mia Delk + Kris Downing134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–204L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Stacey Heisler
41W–66L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Ellen Frazer
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Mary Bonsall
14W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Lisa Kirkwood
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–303L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Eileen Carter
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Kris Downing
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Elizabeth Webster
9W–17L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Lori Copper
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.