Teams

Rally Cats

2024 40&Over Women · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-15vs Drop ShotsWon 40
W#1 DoublesShana Baer / Sheila Deguines vs Alice Levine / Marta Kuttner6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLouise Arkel vs ISABELLA BLUMBERG6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCaitlyn Parker / Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano vs Jodi Friedman / Patty Branthover4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElisabeth Mischel / Nancy Rudgers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-10vs Plainfield PlayersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJuanita Tam / Shana Baer vs Jan Hoth / Joanna Tricorache6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCaitlyn Parker / Christine Rafizadeh vs Debra Gloster / Takayo Futamura0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Rudgers / Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano vs Donna Makowski / Linda Tomasetti2-6, 5-3, 1-0
2024-07-01vs GK TitansLost 12
W#1 DoublesSheila Deguines / Shana Baer vs Carla Gaeta / Melissa Lowy7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLouise Arkel vs Margery Zietchick6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAna Laura Gonzalez-Quijano / Christine Rafizadeh vs Tina Gee-Ng / Diana Rosenkrantz2-6, 2-6
2024-06-27vs MSU: Green Means GoLost 13
W#1 DoublesSheila Deguines / Shana Baer vs Michele Gioia / Donna Nagel6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJuanita Tam vs Stacey Medeiros4-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Chang / Dene Lee vs JANET van MOL / Valerie Tchikanda6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Mischel / Nancy Rudgers vs Dawn Donnelly / Jean Young0-6, 0-6
2024-06-19vs MSU: Green Means GoLost 03
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Mischel / Shana Baer vs Dawn Donnelly / Jean Young1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLouise Arkel vs Marie Collazo5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Rudgers / Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano vs Katherine Thomas / Heather Adler4-6, 3-6
2024-06-12vs GK Honey DeucesWon 40
W#1 DoublesJuanita Tam / Sheila Deguines vs Maura Murray / Margaret Hodge6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAna Laura Gonzalez-Quijano vs Anne Finetto6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeanne Harootunian / Stephanie Chang vs Mary Pezzella / Christine Keating6-2, 5-1
W#3 DoublesCaitlyn Parker / Marilyn Janssen vs Joanne Skelton / Claudia Gilbert4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-11vs Plainfield PlayersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSheila Deguines / Shana Baer vs Patricia Vaughan / Suzanne Carraby-Jones3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJuanita Tam vs Brigette Elaina Brooks6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Mischel / Dene Lee vs Deborah Rogut / Noel Olsen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Rafizadeh / Nancy Rudgers vs Alicia Shieh / Liang Chao1-6, 0-6
2024-05-23vs GK TitansWon 31
W#1 DoublesSheila Deguines / Juanita Tam vs Earnecia Hasben-Powers / Susan Hutton6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLouise Arkel vs Tina Gee-Ng6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Mischel / Dene Lee vs Jami Kurschner / Katherine Williams6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Rafizadeh / Jeanne Harootunian vs Amy Devico / Sharon Muenster6-7, 1-2
2024-05-08vs GK Honey DeucesWon 40
W#1 DoublesSheila Deguines / Juanita Tam vs Margaret Hodge / Lori Roth6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLouise Arkel vs Susan Roos6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Mischel / Shana Baer vs Maura Murray / Christine Keating6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCaitlyn Parker / Nancy Rudgers vs Joanne Wroblewski / Joanne Skelton6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-01-10vs GK Honey DeucesWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Gilio / Jeanne Harootunian vs Maura Murray / Breda Ryan-Blake6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Juanita Tam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Louise Arkel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Shana Baer
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.32
Sheila Deguines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Elisabeth Mischel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dene Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Nancy Rudgers
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.80
Christine Rafizadeh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Caitlyn Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeanne Harootunian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marilyn Janssen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Mischel + Dene Lee5159% games+14.0% vs expected
Sheila Deguines + Shana Baer211060% games+6.5% vs expected
Louise Arkel + Juanita Tam2351% games−0.3% vs expected
Nancy Rudgers + Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano4349% games−7.3% vs expected
Nancy Rudgers + Elisabeth Mischel7946% games−9.6% vs expected
Nancy Rudgers + Christine Rafizadeh3738% games−13.8% vs expected
Sheila Deguines + Juanita Tam6171% gamesnot enough data
Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano + Christine Rafizadeh3351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Juanita Tam
161W–104L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Louise Arkel
128W–102L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Shana Baer
62W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Sheila Deguines
135W–50L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Elisabeth Mischel
48W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Dene Lee
22W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano
45W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Nancy Rudgers
33W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Christine Rafizadeh
28W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Caitlyn Parker
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeanne Harootunian
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marilyn Janssen
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.