Teams

IE-APTC-Ruby V.

2021 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Mixed 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-29vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 02
L#1 DoublesElliott Kiedrowski / Cleo Collier vs David Duncan / Judy Henning2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNeil Safai / Jannah Carrasco vs Liz Chavez / Doug van Soest2-6, 5-7
2021-08-22vs IE-LLW-David/SesilieLost 02
L#1 DoublesNick Herbon / Connie DeLong vs Scott Soren / Dana Olague6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWayne West / Cleo Collier vs Dang Nguyen / Elizabeth Rydall6-7, 3-6
2021-08-15vs IE-CL-Andrea BohnWon 20
W#2 DoublesWayne West / Connie DeLong vs Bill Conlin / Danette Conlin6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElliott Kiedrowski / Cleo Collier vs Wendy Williams / Matt Williams6-1, 6-3
2021-08-01vs IE-UofR-Don HoakLost 02
L#2 DoublesCleo Collier / Carlos Hansen vs Susane Hong / James Gardner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesConnie DeLong / Nick Herbon vs Denise Stewart / Kennett Lai3-6, 2-6
2021-07-18vs IE-LLW-David/SesilieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlfonso Nevarez / Jannah Carrasco vs Danny Castle / Kathalena Cocker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElliott Kiedrowski / Jane Magro vs Ian Wheeldon / Theresa Winterburn4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-11vs IE-CL-Andrea BohnWon 10
W#2 DoublesJane Magro / Elliott Kiedrowski vs Bill Conlin / Danette Conlin6-2, 6-4
2021-06-19vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#2 DoublesElliott Kiedrowski / Jane Magro vs Amanda Will / David Duncan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Carlos Hansen
published 4
3.63
Wayne West
published
3.52
Saleshnie Sukhram
published 3.5
3.41
Jane Magro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Jannah Carrasco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Connie DeLong
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Cleo Collier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Alfonso Nevarez
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Saleshnie Sukhram + Alfonso Nevarez6258% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlos Hansen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Wayne West
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Saleshnie Sukhram
114W–80L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Jane Magro
73W–54L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jannah Carrasco
84W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Connie DeLong
49W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Cleo Collier
88W–64L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Alfonso Nevarez
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.