Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Vermehren (2:3)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-01vs SD 3.0 Mountain View/ Ibarra (3:2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLourdes Carrasco / Carisa Hackworth vs Ariela Zagursky / Irma Ibarra4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-04vs SD LLW 3.0 Coronado TC/ KimballWon 10
W#3 DoublesMerrie Mebust / Carisa Hackworth vs Megan West / Lyle Anderson0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-27vs SD 3.0 LJB&T/ Khoury (3:2)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarisa Hackworth / Marlis Vermehren vs Wendy Marchbanks / Tiffany Brown3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-20vs SD 3.0 Mountain View/ Ibarra (3:2)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarisa Hackworth / Meagan McKissick vs Irma Ibarra / Ariela Zagursky4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Ana Paula Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.21
Meagan McKissick
published
3.07
Jennifer Vernallis
published
2.96
Carisa Hackworth
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Alejandra Cortes
published 3
2.87
Leslie Vineyard
published 3
2.76
Carla Guastoni
published 3
2.74
2.65
Marlis Vermehren
published
2.57
Merrie Mebust
published
2.45
Heidi Nevitt
published 3
2.42
Patricia Padilla
published
Kelly Mineo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Vineyard + Carisa Hackworth3268% gamesnot enough data
Dianne Lookabaugh + Marlis Vermehren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ana Paula Gonzalez
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Meagan McKissick
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Vernallis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Carisa Hackworth
45W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Alejandra Cortes
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Maricarmen Inchaurrandieta
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Leslie Vineyard
30W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Carla Guastoni
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Dianne Lookabaugh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
Marlis Vermehren
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Merrie Mebust
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Heidi Nevitt
7W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
Patricia Padilla
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kelly Mineo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.