Teams

Magnum - Mixed 18s 4.0 - Thurs

2024 Piedmont Mixed 18 & Over · 4.0 Mixed Dbls Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-27vs Jones - Mixed 18s 4.0 ThursLost 01
L#3 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Ron Mangrum vs Cj Isner / Stuart Cox3-6, 3-6
2024-06-20vs Mays - Mixed 18s 4.0 ThursLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaryn Efird / Wayne Hamilton vs Joann Hartzell / Martin Mailloux2-6, 3-6
2024-06-13vs Herron - Mixed 18s 4.0 ThursLost 01
L#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Brad Johnson vs Sally Eagleton / Peter Novosad3-6, 3-6
2024-06-06vs Cochran - Mixed 18s 4.0 ThursSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Shawn McFarlin vs Rhyssa Earley / Riccardo Petty6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaryn Efird / Ron Mangrum vs Jordan Cohen / Dabney Porter1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Dbls Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Sarah Dunning
published
3.90
Brenda Willis
published 4
3.88
Marla Barnwell
published
3.86
Peter Cohen
published
3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Virginia Easley
published
Anne Naude
published 4
3.68
Travis Bui-Klimke
published
3.58
Karyn Efird
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.56
Ron Mangrum
published
3.54
Matthew Dunning
published
Johan Naude
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Dunning + Matthew Dunning123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Dunning
34W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Brenda Willis
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
Marla Barnwell
42W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
Peter Cohen
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Virginia Easley
25W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Anne Naude
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Travis Bui-Klimke
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
Ron Mangrum
14W–35L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Matthew Dunning
34W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.54
Johan Naude
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.