Teams

SRTC-Murphy

2026 OH OV WINTER A18&O Daytime · 2026 Winter A18&O 3.0 Women Daytime

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-05-12vs QRRC-HayesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSusan Holbrook vs Anjali Ahmed2-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBonnie Grieco / Pat Forster vs Phyllis Adams / Kamna Gupta6-2, 6-5
2026-04-28vs QRRC-BrooksLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Teresa Siefke vs Jessica Rippl / Erin Vitale4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Holbrook vs Sam Linhardt4-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesLiz Smith / Pat Forster vs Susan Holm / Mary Timm7-6, 4-2
2026-04-14vs STC-BauerLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Forster / Bonnie Grieco vs Chanda Rohrer / Susan Spafford4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Davenport / Maureen Murphy vs Gina Brenner / Sara Bowen0-6, 0-6
2026-03-31vs QRRC-HayesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTeresa Siefke / Jessica Franklin vs Melissa Conrad / Phyllis Adams6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Holbrook vs Anjali Ahmed7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBonnie Grieco / Pat Forster vs Sheri Hayes / Jennifer Bouz3-6, 4-6
2026-03-17vs STC-BauerWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Christianna Mcname vs Patricia Robinson / Melissa Jock6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTeresa Siefke vs Cathy Bauer6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPat Forster / Bonnie Grieco vs Gina Brenner / Pam Stewart2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-03vs QRRC-BrooksLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Holbrook / Jessica Franklin vs Samantha Brinkman-Berkhofer / Jeanna Stecklein7-6, 3-5, 1-0
2026-02-17vs QRRC-HayesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Holbrook / Colleen Murphy vs Michelle Lewis / Montana Wait6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLauren Erdmann vs Anjali Ahmed1-6, 5-7
2026-02-10vs STC-BauerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Holbrook / Teresa Siefke vs Patricia Robinson / Raenell Poynter6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLiz Smith / Franziska Williamson vs Gina Brenner / Janice Bensman0-6, 2-6
2026-02-03vs QRRC-BrooksLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Lauren Erdmann vs Jessica Rippl / Breanne Whalen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSusan Holbrook vs Samantha Brinkman-Berkhofer3-6, 2-6
2026-01-27vs QRRC-HayesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Holbrook / Teresa Siefke vs Phyllis Adams / Krystle Burris6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesConnie Davenport / Pat Forster vs Ailing Weng / Michelle Lewis4-6, 1-6
2026-01-20vs QRRC-BrooksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Holbrook / Teresa Siefke vs Jessica Borchers / Starlene Brooks6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesConnie Davenport / Rebecca Reeves vs Mary Timm / Leslie Guinto3-6, 4-6
2026-01-13vs STC-BauerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Teresa Siefke vs Melissa Jock / Valarie O'Connell6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSusan Holbrook vs Raenell Poynter4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristianna Mcname / Liz Smith vs Janice Bensman / Susan Spafford7-6, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Winter A18&O 3.0 Women Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Christianna Mcname
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Teresa Siefke
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.68
Lauren Erdmann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Bonnie Grieco
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Susan Holbrook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.30
Pat Forster
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.03
Connie Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.78
Franziska Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Forster + Bonnie Grieco261656% games+8.9% vs expected
Franziska Williamson + Connie Davenport0932% games−7.8% vs expected
Pat Forster + Connie Davenport0531% gamesnot enough data
Susan Holbrook + Teresa Siefke3257% gamesnot enough data
Christianna Mcname + Lauren Erdmann314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Siefke + Lauren Erdmann224 matchesnot enough data
Christianna Mcname + Teresa Siefke033 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Grieco + Connie Davenport303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christianna Mcname
30W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Teresa Siefke
48W–43L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%7%93%
2.71
Lauren Erdmann
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Bonnie Grieco
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Susan Holbrook
47W–32L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Pat Forster
36W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Connie Davenport
21W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Franziska Williamson
10W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Maureen Murphy
1W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.