Teams

CMills-UNC

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5 Women Day

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-01vs LBible-DURWon 10
W#3 SinglesLAURIE KIEFFER vs RANEE KUMAR6-4, 6-4
2025-11-24vs LBible-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Loralie Bible6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLAURIE KIEFFER vs RANEE KUMAR7-6, 6-3
2025-11-20vs MLong-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Deb Lanier6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLAURIE KIEFFER vs Joyce Robinson1-6, 2-6
2025-11-17vs MLong-DURWon 10
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Deb Lanier6-0, 6-3
2025-10-13vs MLong-DURWon 10
W#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Richelle Robinson6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Dana Cantrell
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Anne Cable
published 3.5
3.34
Courtney Mills
published 3
3.16
Rebekah Farris
published
2.87
LAURIE KIEFFER
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebekah Farris + Courtney Mills3456% games+2.8% vs expected
LAURIE KIEFFER + Rebekah Farris3448% games−4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Cantrell
57W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Anne Cable
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3
Courtney Mills
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
Rebekah Farris
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
LAURIE KIEFFER
70W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.