Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18MX8.0B

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Kevin Margo
published
4.21
John Rongxiang Hu
published
3.94
Silvana Gold
published
3.89
Shelly Wallace
published
3.83
Julia Peng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Kimi Sato
published
3.79
Ashok Anumandla
published 4
3.73
Anh-Vi Dao
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Nadiia Gazda
published
3.71
Chris Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Robert Gosalvez
published
3.63
Paul Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Dorien Africa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Abhijeet Karnik
published 4
3.58
Ella Wu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Gautham Arumugam
published
3.46
Peter Kuo
published
3.42
William Africa
published
3.40
Twinee Madan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Ben Chen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Haewon Kwon
published
3.16
Jin Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Zeinab Ebadat
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Rongxiang Hu + Jin Zhang123 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Wallace + William Africa123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Margo
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
John Rongxiang Hu
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Silvana Gold
45W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Shelly Wallace
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
Julia Peng
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Kimi Sato
22W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ashok Anumandla
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Anh-Vi Dao
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Nadiia Gazda
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Chris Joseph
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Robert Gosalvez
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Paul Kwon
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Dorien Africa
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Abhijeet Karnik
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Ella Wu
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Gautham Arumugam
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Peter Kuo
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
William Africa
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
Twinee Madan
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Ben Chen
23W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Haewon Kwon
44W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jin Zhang
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Zeinab Ebadat
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.