Teams

SDNC 3.5 La Costa/ D'Ambrosio

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SD WE · SD - Women - 3.5 WE (SD

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#2 DoublesLaura Kieffer / Erin Pasqualini vs Christi McClain / Judy Nelson1-6, 5-7
2023-03-05vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ WilsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica D'Ambrosio / Erin Pasqualini vs Julie Read / Carole Farr4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJulie Gomez / Erin Pasqualini vs Clare Lemon / Jennifer Hackett6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica D'Ambrosio / Shelie Herman vs Jessica Fosse / Shelley Wright3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesErin Pasqualini / Laura Kieffer vs Judy Nelson / Helen Farr4-6, 1-6
2023-02-05vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ WilsonLost 02
L#1 SinglesJessica D'Ambrosio vs Junli Feng6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Kieffer / Erin Pasqualini vs Rita Murphy / Liz Perkins6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShelie Herman vs Kerri Reed5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanelle Anisso / Jessica D'Ambrosio vs Shelley Wright / Jessica Fosse3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-22vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ WilsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesJessica D'Ambrosio vs Chenyang Rickard6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErin Pasqualini / Allie Rubey vs Rita Murphy / Sally Myungok Yeem7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanelle Anisso / Erin Pasqualini vs Robyn Rice / Maeve Brick2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 WE (SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Andrea Goodwin
published 4
3.65
Julie Gomez
published
3.59
Shelie Herman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Erin Pasqualini
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Dee Dee Zielinski
published 3.5
3.07
Heather Collins
published
3.05
Jessica D'Ambrosio
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Tricia Bothmer
published
Janelle Anisso
published
Laura Kieffer
published
Rochelle Johnson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Goodwin
23W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Julie Gomez
22W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.65
4
Shelie Herman
49W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Erin Pasqualini
56W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Dee Dee Zielinski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Heather Collins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Jessica D'Ambrosio
61W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Tricia Bothmer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Janelle Anisso
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Kieffer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rochelle Johnson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.