Teams

6 Burkwood Colgin

2022 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-27vs 5 Avalon LancasterWon 20
W#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Anne Murray vs Mahesh Sukumaran / Daniela Otto2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBret McFee / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Lara Green / Robert Preservati6-0, 6-0
2022-07-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesSam McKelvey / Anne Murray vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-13vs 2 Westwood SlegowskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hughes / Sam McKelvey vs Alicia Cecil / Andrew Cecil6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-29vs 10 ACAC DelisioWon 10
W#2 DoublesBret McFee / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Eric Nelson / Christina Aeinan Kang7-6, 6-4
2022-06-20vs 9 Deep Run HouffWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Decker / Adam Decker vs Brian Zollinhofer / Tanisha Moseley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Erin Decker vs Eric Spivack / Karen Ellis6-1, 6-1
2022-05-11vs 8 JRHS Captain Morgan’s SurgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Decker / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Greg Deeb / Lauren Palmer0-6, 2-6
2022-05-04vs 7 Avalon WilliamsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hughes / Adam Decker vs Connie Jervey / David Rathke3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Vonderlehr Nolan / Tom Newton vs Bob Riggs / Sonia Haley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.22
Billy Fulwider
published 4.5
4.14
Erin Decker
published 4.5
3.86
Adam Decker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Sam McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Anne Murray
published 4
3.65
Tom Newton
published
3.55
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Bret McFee
published 4
3.46
Mario Wright
published
Joseph Golden
published
Melissa Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Vonderlehr Nolan + Adam Decker3347% gamesnot enough data
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan + Sam McKelvey314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Billy Fulwider
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Erin Decker
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.14
4
Adam Decker
149W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Sam McKelvey
158W–91L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Anne Murray
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Newton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan
105W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Bret McFee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Mario Wright
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Joseph Golden
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Stewart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.