Teams

TOCC - Radius NPC

2022 Mixed 18 & Over-GC · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Doug Nash
published 4
3.54
David Pilger
published 3.5
3.25
Shari Pol
published
3.14
Jodi Radius
published
2.99
Richard Mattiace
published
2.99
Kelly Pilger
published
2.58
Trista Nash
published
Lauren Mattiace
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doug Nash
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Cynthia Render-Leach
26W–69L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
David Pilger
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shari Pol
64W–64L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jodi Radius
49W–52L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Richard Mattiace
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Kelly Pilger
53W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
Trista Nash
14W–27L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Lauren Mattiace
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.