Teams

LVTA BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-17vs FCCC WHITEWon 31
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs KARA JONES / Kim McConnellogue6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Melissa Basta6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Black / Ashley Kasprzak vs Holly K. Brown / Michelle Clark6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJaclin Elkins / Austin Johnson vs Catherine Orr / Tricia Diehl3-6, 4-6
2025-07-10vs TAG YELLOWSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Dawn Hagen vs Angela Ehrlich / Diane Marion4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Amy Bowness6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRona van Sickle / Austin Johnson vs Shawna Disparti / Tyler Heberer2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Christina Whalen vs Kimberly Seyboldt / Elina Fresquez1-6, 3-6
2025-07-03vs LT SILVERWon 21
W#1 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Jaclin Elkins vs Falguni Gill / Jill Brooks7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Lisa Novacek6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Christina Whalen vs Carri Miller / Janice Mossberg0-6, 2-6
2025-06-26vs MLF ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Dawn Hagen vs Lara Abrahamson / Tracy Hutton4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Black / Ashley Kasprzak vs Marni Crowell / Meg Otepka6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRona van Sickle / Cathy Simon vs Corey Green / LaRae Sehr4-6, 1-6
2025-06-19vs HMTC PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Elizabeth Smith vs Debbie Hansen / Stacey Fox6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Sara Schaffer6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAustin Johnson / Jaclin Elkins vs Ginger Victor / Cimarron Spitz6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Cathy Simon vs Sharon Sturges / Teresa Adsit1-6, 3-6
2025-06-12vs FCCC WHITEWon 31
L#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Ashley Kasprzak vs Holly K. Brown / Kim McConnellogue2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Tara Leman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Jaclin Elkins vs KARA JONES / Robyn Brady3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRona van Sickle / Cathy Simon vs Tricia Diehl / Stefanie Haines6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-05vs TAG YELLOWSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Black / Ashley Kasprzak vs Rosalie Krammer / Julie Ratliff6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Becky Buhler1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Angela Ehrlich / Diane Marion3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Rona van Sickle vs Elina Fresquez / Kimberly Seyboldt2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kathy Jacobson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Ashley Kasprzak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Dawn Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jaclin Elkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Austin Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Rona van Sickle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Christina Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Dawn Hagen20857% games+4.0% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Jaclin Elkins6448% games+2.2% vs expected
Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Jaclin Elkins5350% games+1.3% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Lesa Morrill-Hughes4947% games−2.4% vs expected
Jaclin Elkins + Nancy Pflughoeft4252% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Hagen + Nancy Pflughoeft224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pflughoeft + Ashley Kasprzak044 matchesnot enough data
Austin Johnson + Nancy Pflughoeft213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Jacobson
23W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Ashley Kasprzak
39W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dawn Hagen
43W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jaclin Elkins
63W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
83W–71L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Austin Johnson
41W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Rona van Sickle
17W–45L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Christina Whalen
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.