Teams

Mike's 3.5 #3

2023 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-05vs No Ka OiWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Dunn / Ray van Dijk vs Gordie Brown / Reuben Dela Cruz2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Bisquera / Christopher Horiuchi vs Chris Morakis / Michael Shim1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonald Chaikin / Daniel Jacob vs Charles Horsman / Monty Tester6-4, 6-4
2023-01-22vs Mike's 3.5 #2Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Horiuchi / Gerald Kalua vs Jonathan Lau / Gary Oshiro4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-08vs Mike's 3.5 #1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Horiuchi / Gerald Kalua vs Eugene Hong / Miles Matsui0-6, 1-6
2023-01-07vs No Ka OiLost 13
L#1 DoublesCharles Bisquera / Christopher Horiuchi vs Chris Morakis / Barry Probst3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Jacob vs Reuben Dela Cruz6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDonald Chaikin / Gerald Kalua vs James Bauer / Gordie Brown1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Kerstein / Kevin Madaya vs Charles Horsman / Michael Shim3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charles Bisquera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Daniel Jacob
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Donald Chaikin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Gerald Kalua
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Christopher Horiuchi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kevin Madaya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Kerstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Kinoshita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ray van Dijk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerald Kalua + Christopher Horiuchi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Bisquera
13W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Jacob
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Donald Chaikin
17W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Gerald Kalua
23W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
Christopher Horiuchi
45W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
Kevin Madaya
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Kerstein
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michael Kinoshita
29W–56L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Paul Dunn
19W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ray van Dijk
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.