Teams

Greenhill/Johnson-Sipes M3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S M. League

16 players · average NTRP 3.44 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-04vs Kiest/Seering-Johnson M3.5Won 50
W#1 DoublesDaniel Pronovost / Ryan Rich vs Nathaniel Tanner / Glenn Johnson6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAlexander Michael vs Kevin Rowley6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDarrell Taylor / Bo Ward vs Eduardo Garcia / Nathaniel Barnett6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesManny Ferrer vs Brandon Hardeman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBen Newman / Brian Sipes vs David Barclift / Gerardo DeLeon6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S M. League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Daniel Pronovost
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Ben Newman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Alexander Michael
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Bo Ward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Safwan Hallab
published
3.33
Ryan Rich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Scott Wracher
published
3.30
Manny Ferrer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Jeff Itscovitch
published
3.27
Brian Sipes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Darrell Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Chung Pi
published 3.5
3.02
Sammy Sriva
published
2.98
Chun Yi Huang
published 3
Jay Bell
published
Yaoqi Guo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Rich + Safwan Hallab4351% games−3.2% vs expected
Manny Ferrer + Chung Pi2548% games−6.9% vs expected
Ben Newman + Brian Sipes2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Pronovost
26W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Ben Newman
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Alexander Michael
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Bo Ward
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Safwan Hallab
22W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Ryan Rich
23W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Scott Wracher
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Manny Ferrer
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Jeff Itscovitch
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brian Sipes
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Darrell Taylor
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Chung Pi
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Sammy Sriva
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Chun Yi Huang
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Jay Bell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yaoqi Guo
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.