Teams

Marco YMCA - Gauch

2021 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesRichard Lewis / Marco Arilli vs Michael Dangelo / Jeff Rothe6-3, 6-4
2021-03-09vs Longshore Lake - MintzLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Lewis / Marco Arilli vs Ben Yocom / Kyle VanKleeck1-6, 0-6
2021-03-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesTim Huffman / Wayne Woodring vs Joseph Corasanti / S Harrill6-0, 6-1
2021-02-23vs Players Club - WenningerWon 10
W#1 DoublesWayne Woodring / Tim Huffman vs Greg Davis / Larry Addabbo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
David Ceryak
published 3.5
3.50
Wayne Woodring
published
3.43
Tim Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
James Crines
published 3.5
3.36
Michael Rathbone
published
Dunnley Mattke
published 3.5
3.14
John Dougherty
published
3.03
Reimar Gauch
published
2.83
Ron Hauk
published
Ken Walter
published
Marco Arilli
published
Mark Waks
published
Peter Serunian
published
Richard Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Kloustin
published
Wayne Erne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Erne + Robert Kloustin224 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Woodring + Michael Rathbone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Ceryak
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2021
<1%9%91%
3.68
Wayne Woodring
27W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
Tim Huffman
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
James Crines
6W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
Michael Rathbone
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Dunnley Mattke
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Dougherty
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
Reimar Gauch
59W–55L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
Ron Hauk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
91%9%<1%
2.83
Ken Walter
1W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marco Arilli
19W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Waks
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Serunian
35W–40L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Lewis
118W–158L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Kloustin
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wayne Erne
94W–113L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.