Teams

Las Posas Highballs

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-01vs Sherwood StarletsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeri Kettle / Lisa Zins vs Melissa Hariton / Dena Feingold6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-20vs Royal GirlfriendsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Nash / Lisa Zins vs Sandra Jou / Anita Spraggs3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Krista Howard
published
3.07
Jamie Hadler
published 3
2.88
Maureen Finnigan
published
2.79
2.75
Lisa Zins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Gina Howey
published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
published
2.59
Mary Nash
published
2.57
Carol Pollock
published 3
2.55
Catalina Wise
published 3
2.52
J Chen
published 3
2.51
Susan Custance
published
2.50
Keri Kettle
published
2.39
Riitta Andonian
published
2.34
Teresa James
published
Laura Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riitta Andonian + Patty Bolland3444% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Finnigan + Gina Howey4156% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Zins + Gina Howey123 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Finnigan + Michelle Soto de Carvalho213 matchesnot enough data
J Chen + Patty Bolland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Howard
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Jamie Hadler
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Maureen Finnigan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
Michelle Soto de Carvalho
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Lisa Zins
42W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.63
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
2.59
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Catalina Wise
3W–15L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
J Chen
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Keri Kettle
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Riitta Andonian
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.39
Teresa James
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.34
Laura Foster
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.