Teams

TYCC - J. Carricato

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#2 SinglesAmanda Rockwood vs Melissa Gerardi6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Carricato / Amanda Rockwood vs Dawn McKnight / Alice Teagle6-1, 6-4
2022-11-03vs Davis Island 3.5 - J. MaxwellLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Dellegatto / Johnna Cunningham vs Luz Maria von Greiff / Vicki Camposano2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAmanda Rockwood vs Katherine Cowley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-20vs FH Net Crashers - C. DemingLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Dellegatto / Leigh Gardner vs Jillian Baizan / Astrid Martin4-6, 4-6
2022-09-15vs Davis Island 3.5 - J. MaxwellWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Rockwood vs SELMA MCQUEEN2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Amanda Rockwood
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.43
Johnna Cunningham
published
3.27
Sarah Watkins
published
3.27
Jennifer Harrell
published
Courtney Rankin
published 3.5
3.24
Suzanne Davis
published
3.16
Mary Ann Dellegatto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Erica Brandon
published
3.08
3.03
Mary McKell
published
2.95
2.87
Paige Murtagh
published
SHERI ELLIS
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ann Dellegatto + Amanda Rockwood5457% games−0.9% vs expected
Jennifer Harrell + Erica Brandon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Rockwood
103W–73L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Johnna Cunningham
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
Sarah Watkins
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
Jennifer Harrell
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Courtney Rankin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Davis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Mary Ann Dellegatto
68W–108L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Erica Brandon
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jacqueline Carricato
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Mary McKell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Christine Dietrich
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Paige Murtagh
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
SHERI ELLIS
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.