Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Juan

2022 Collier Mixed 40 & Over Fall · Mixed 40 7.0 Fall

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-19vs Cambier - ConroyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBobby Marks / Alejandra Acuna vs Walt Conroy / Joan Barrett7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-20vs Cambier - D. RushingWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlejandra Acuna / Charles Ferrara vs Susan Crum / Jon Kaplan6-3, 6-0
2021-11-13vs FALL Winner - Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlejandra Acuna / Juan Quiroga vs Andrea Washak / Tim Huffman1-6, 2-6
2021-11-09vs Cambier - ConroyWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Marks / Corey Stranger vs Walt Conroy / Caroline Rogers6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlejandra Acuna / Juan Quiroga vs William Kiley / Peggy Sealfon6-1, 6-0
2021-10-30vs Esplanade - G. SaundersWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlejandra Acuna / Elvin Vargas vs Leslie Martin / Craig Norman6-2, 6-3
2021-10-23vs Saturnia - FischelWon 10
W#1 DoublesJuan Quiroga / Alejandra Acuna vs Cheryl Toth / Tod Toth6-2, 6-2
2021-10-16vs Cambier - D. RushingLost 01
L#2 DoublesJuan Quiroga / Alejandra Acuna vs Lewis Carran / Susan Crum4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 7.0 Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Bobby Marks
published 4
3.78
Kami Barnes
published
3.73
Alejandra Acuna
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.65
Elvin Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Maristela Battilana
published
3.16
Corey Stranger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Juan Quiroga
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Leticia Lancsarics
published
Michelle Bammel
published
Nick Puga
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Quiroga + Alejandra Acuna224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bobby Marks
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.85
Kami Barnes
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Alejandra Acuna
106W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Elvin Vargas
127W–111L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Maristela Battilana
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Corey Stranger
223W–172L career · 1 line in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Juan Quiroga
85W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leticia Lancsarics
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Bammel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nick Puga
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.