Teams

Chance/Dollar 55+ 7.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-03vs Berreth 55+ 7.5WNWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Calkins / Libby Strickland vs Ann Evans / Marsha Tice6-3, 6-3
2022-09-26vs Majestic 55+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesBecky Kincaid / Libby Strickland vs Bee Baker / Lisa Baker1-6, 1-6
2022-09-19vs Beshears/Susong 55+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Calkins / Libby Strickland vs Janis Beshears / Keevie Martin6-2, 6-4
2022-08-29vs Majestic 55+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesLibby Strickland / Martha Cox vs Tonya Lomas / Lisa Baker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-08vs Majestic 55+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Susan Calkins vs Carrie Ganim / Mary Dean2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-01vs Beshears/Susong 55+ 7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartha Cox / Libby Strickland vs Susan Payne / Mary Fowler6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.38
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.31
Martha Cox
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.25
Susan Calkins
published
Becky Kincaid
published 3.5
3.25
Pamela Aikens
published
3.15
Jaime Hendricks
published 3.5
3.11
Vickie Degges
published
2.98
Darci Gold
published 3.5
2.89
Missy Chance
published
2.86
Beverly Burke
published 3
Jennie Pekarne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Aikens + Jaime Hendricks123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Calkins + Becky Kincaid303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Martha Cox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Susan Calkins
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Becky Kincaid
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Aikens
19W–36L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jaime Hendricks
13W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Vickie Degges
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Darci Gold
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Missy Chance
14W–32L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Beverly Burke
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jennie Pekarne
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.