Teams

Ardea Hueholt

2024 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-22vs Seminole Lake PriceWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Annichiarico / Karen Braudis vs Sally Blush / Christine Price7-6, 6-4
2024-06-15vs Belleair Fresh PrincessesLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Hueholt / Karen Braudis vs Shannon Connolly / Haven Poirier4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-08vs Ardea SweetshotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Braudis / Beth Gregson vs Martha Cornatzer / Noela Fries6-4, 6-4
2024-05-18vs Pinellas/Morgan/40&Over3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bandes / Karen Braudis vs Deb Spears / Krissy Heybroek3-6, 1-6
2024-05-13vs InnisbrookLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Braudis / Teresa Orr vs Theresa Whiddon / Donna Denhof6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-27vs Seminole Smash GirlsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Braudis / Beth Gregson vs Kristen Shinners / Cindy Kobeda4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-13vs McMullen Ebony & IvoryWon 10
W#1 DoublesHelene Newsome / Karen Braudis vs Kim Williams / Tricia Lolkus6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Mary Bandes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Karen Braudis
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.28
Andrea Villafranca
published 3.5
3.17
Amy Burns
published 3.5
2.67
Gail Stallwood
published
Helene Newsome
published
Leslie McMahon
published
Teresa Orr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Bandes + Karen Braudis2345% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Bandes
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Karen Braudis
36W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Villafranca
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Amy Burns
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Christine Hueholt
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Gail Stallwood
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Helene Newsome
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Annichiarico
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie McMahon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Orr
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.