Teams

Justice/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 2.5 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-02vs Fairchild/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Schaefer / Susannah Mays vs Doriann Fairchild / Emily Rainey6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Presley / Rachel Veteto vs Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin / Lexi Dickerson6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNeely Mcdurmon / Anna Embry vs Kelsey Ray / Greer Moyes4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Caroline Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Caroline Martin
published 3
2.52
Susannah Mays
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Kelly Presley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Jade Moss
published
2.17
Meredith Brasfield
published
2.10
Lisa Berryhill
published
2.08
Laura Justice
published
2.05
Rachel Veteto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.90
Anna Embry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.88
Neely Mcdurmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Keating Lowery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Berryhill + Laura Justice3248% gamesnot enough data
Jade Moss + Caroline Martin2348% gamesnot enough data
Neely Mcdurmon + Anna Embry0526% gamesnot enough data
Meredith Brasfield + Lisa Berryhill033 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Brasfield + Rachel Veteto123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Martin + Caroline Schaefer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Schaefer
22W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Caroline Martin
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Susannah Mays
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
Kelly Presley
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Jade Moss
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Meredith Brasfield
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Lisa Berryhill
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Laura Justice
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Rachel Veteto
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Anna Embry
0W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Neely Mcdurmon
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Keating Lowery
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.