Teams

Hanus/Rogers/PCC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-01-19vs Weber/Farmington/FACLost 03
L#1 SinglesLisa Bores vs Callie Brannon7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCourtney Naudo vs Kjersti Carpenter4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKimberly Larsen vs Lyndsey Weber2-6, 0-6
2024-12-11vs McLaughlin-Chrenka/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesLisa Bores vs Laurel Schley1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKathryn Stark vs Nur Kamilah Chrenka1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAmanda Philpot vs Kayla McLaughlin2-6, 0-6
2024-11-10vs Erickson/Springdale/INDLost 12
W#1 SinglesLisa Bores vs Monte Broussard7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAmanda Philpot vs Alison Creasey6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMarjorie Hanus vs Samantha Thiede Erickson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kathryn Stark
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Marjorie Hanus
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Lisa Bores
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Silvia Azrai
published
2.58
Kimberly Larsen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.41
Courtney Naudo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Amanda Philpot
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Tiziana Guptan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Stark
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Marjorie Hanus
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lisa Bores
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
Silvia Azrai
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.61
Kimberly Larsen
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
27%72%<1%
2.58
3
Courtney Naudo
0W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Amanda Philpot
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tiziana Guptan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.