Teams

Woodlake Hannon

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-31vs ACAC Abed Lady LuckLost 13
L#1 DoublesJasmine Kaur / Sharon Shannon vs Suzanne Monroe / Rebecca Rhodes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Byers vs Ashley Curtis0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Snyder / Allie Hannon vs Margaret Thompson / Diane Reale6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Patterson / Wendy Learn vs Peggy Bel / Patricia Foley6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-22vs WW Low & Slo - SlomanWon 32
W#1 DoublesAllie Hannon / Blanka White vs Carleen DiMeglio / Ryan Kirtner6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWendy Learn vs Virginia Jamerson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Snyder / Jasmine Kaur vs Penny Lowrey / Olivia Baker2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesStacey Woods vs Amanda Boys7-6, 3-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Shannon / Ekaterina Singletary vs Sara Sloman / Elizabeth Brogan2-6, 0-6
2025-05-17vs KRA HussWare18+Lost 14
L#1 DoublesSharon Shannon / Allie Hannon vs Sarah Huss / Julie Ranson1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBlanka White vs Huyen Curtis2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Snyder / Ekaterina Singletary vs Ann Brown / Heather DeBolt7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesWendy Learn vs Lindsay Daniel3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Patterson / Kati Hornung vs Camp Kramer / Anita Hoekstra4-6, 4-6
2025-05-10vs Burkwood BrockWon 32
W#1 DoublesJasmine Kaur / Blanka White vs Lauren Stroud / Melissa Brock6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAllie Hannon vs Christine Paul3-6, 1-3
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Snyder / Stacey Woods vs Megan Jernigan / Heather Webb4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Byers vs Christine Lu4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesWendy Learn / Kati Hornung vs Tara Childs / Jennifer Love6-3, 6-1
2025-04-19vs HCC Broughton/MccombWon 32
L#1 DoublesVirginia Patterson / Blanka White vs Andrea Broughton / Tracy Teal2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWendy Learn vs Alison Chesson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAllie Hannon / Sharon Shannon vs Nancy Hahn / Alexia Gerczak6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Byers vs Molly McComb6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKati Hornung / Katherine Patterson vs Corey Booker / Elizabeth Jurkuta2-6, 3-6
2025-04-12vs ACAC - StroblLost 05
L#1 DoublesAllie Hannon / Virginia Patterson vs Alice Albright / Mari Litz3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBlanka White vs Lori Strobl5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJasmine Kaur / Ekaterina Singletary vs Tatiana Bueno / Ariana Dickens3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Snyder vs Michelle Lilly4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Learn / Kati Hornung vs Nicky Granback / Taryn Adkins6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-05vs Raintree BryanLost 23
L#1 DoublesSharon Shannon / Suzanne Snyder vs Heather Harvey / Holly Hathaway7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBlanka White vs Amber Manry6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllie Hannon / Ekaterina Singletary vs Peggy Bryan / Alexis Bullard2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Byers vs Jean Cheek6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKatherine Patterson / Stacey Woods vs Kathi Ford / Truitt Allcott3-6, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Blanka White
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Sharon Shannon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.87
Virginia Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Wendy Learn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.75
Allie Hannon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Ekaterina Singletary
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Kati Hornung
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.70
Jennifer Byers
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.65
Suzanne Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.55
Stacey Woods
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Katherine Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jasmine Kaur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Hannon + Wendy Learn3252% games+5.1% vs expected
Wendy Learn + Jennifer Byers314 matchesnot enough data
Blanka White + Sharon Shannon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Blanka White
37W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Sharon Shannon
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
Virginia Patterson
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Wendy Learn
25W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Allie Hannon
28W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ekaterina Singletary
3W–6L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kati Hornung
18W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.71
Jennifer Byers
17W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Suzanne Snyder
3W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Stacey Woods
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Katherine Patterson
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
Jasmine Kaur
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.