Teams

Choy/Montgomery

2026 Tri-Level Metro · 3.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.43 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-04-08vs Hard Court RivalryWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrian Rosenfeld / Matthew Maycock vs Kevin Ko / Edward Lamson6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Taur / Yueqi Li vs Jin-Young Han / Joshua Palmer6-1, 6-2
2026-03-29vs BhagwagarWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Flowers / Oliver He vs Hisao Takahashi / Raymond Borno6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTheodros Dibabu / Bradley Hochwald vs Tariq Habib / Urvish Barot7-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJack Mintz / Yueqi Li vs Naoto Yamamoto / Wesley Lee6-0, 6-3
2026-03-25vs HirshWon 30
W#1 DoublesRob Montgomery / Geoffrey Brennan vs Alex Skaliotis / Diego Orduna6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Rosenfeld / Eduardo Mere vs Craig Knittle / Manuel Freitas6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Taur / Jeffrey Kim vs Suchith Vasudevan / Adam Hauser6-1, 6-1
2026-03-22vs McHugh/ChangWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Lee / Joshua Ong vs Dylan Cauwels / Yang Xu6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Wang / Thomas Jardine vs Sabian Kosinov / Alexander Jenner4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAntoine Reveillon / Surinder Singh vs Ernie Tai / Andrew Ng6-1, 6-0
2026-03-15vs Pink Pony ServesWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrendan O'Connor / Gaurav Chandra vs Alexander Ojugbeli / Gregory Rich6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEduardo Mere / Theodros Dibabu vs Joel Boissiere / Joe Ottenthal6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Taur / Jeffrey Kim vs Steven Brown / Radim Pospisil6-1, 6-3
2026-03-10vs SiasWon 20
W#2 DoublesBradley Hochwald / Simon Wu vs Tabber Benedict / Rahul Bekal6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJack Mintz / Yueqi Li vs David Thomasevich / Xiang Min6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Jordan/WongWon 21
W#1 DoublesOliver He / Joshua Ong vs Felix Wang / Julian Laird7-5, 5-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Maycock / Thomas Jardine vs Kevin Ni / Ian Kolupaev4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSurinder Singh / Antoine Reveillon vs Felix Hui / Noel Paul6-2, 6-2
2026-02-09vs Eastern/Perez/4.0Tri-level MenWon 30
W#1 DoublesRob Montgomery / Ryan Lee vs Adam Katz / David Alfonso6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEduardo Mere / Bradley Hochwald vs Daniel Bi / Gabriel Birman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSurinder Singh / Jack Mintz vs Hae Choi / Todd Thurston6-2, 6-3
2026-02-04vs Full Metal RacquetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Brennan / Brendan O'Connor vs Erik Ulin / Yvan Bedouet6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesThomas Jardine / David Wang vs Yaeger Andrew / Richard Ha7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAntoine Reveillon / Surinder Singh vs David Anderson / Nesim Bahar6-2, 6-2
2026-01-15vs JhaveriWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Lee / Joshua Ong vs Vidur Mittal / Yann Gregoire6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Maycock / Simon Wu vs Neil Goodman / Kevin Gonzalez5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Taur / Jeffrey Kim vs Nicolas Convert / Joseph Vizza3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-07vs Love and LobWon 30
W#1 DoublesRob Montgomery / ZiJun Ou vs Christian Mcintosh Clarke / David Zhang6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSimon Wu / Eduardo Mere vs Nick Heppding / Jarret Ealy6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJack Mintz / Theodros Dibabu vs Sheldon McCloud / Tim Parson6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Oliver He
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Ryan Lee
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.86
ZiJun Ou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Gaurav Chandra
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Brendan O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Joshua Ong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Rob Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Geoffrey Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Eduardo Mere
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
David Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Bradley Hochwald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Robert Flowers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Brian Rosenfeld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Matthew Maycock
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Surinder Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Simon Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Theodros Dibabu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Alvin Choy
published 3.5
3.09
Thomas Jardine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jeffrey Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
David Taur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Jack Mintz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Antoine Reveillon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Yueqi Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Montgomery + Geoffrey Brennan6164% games+37.6% vs expected
Brendan O'Connor + Geoffrey Brennan10163% games+19.8% vs expected
Eduardo Mere + Bradley Hochwald3255% games−2.0% vs expected
Eduardo Mere + Simon Wu6065% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Lee + Joshua Ong404 matchesnot enough data
Alvin Choy + Brian Rosenfeld224 matchesnot enough data
Eduardo Mere + Brian Rosenfeld314 matchesnot enough data
Brian Rosenfeld + Simon Wu314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oliver He
47W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
Ryan Lee
46W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
ZiJun Ou
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Gaurav Chandra
38W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Brendan O'Connor
21W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Joshua Ong
17W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Rob Montgomery
27W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
Geoffrey Brennan
33W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
Eduardo Mere
73W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
David Wang
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Bradley Hochwald
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Robert Flowers
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Brian Rosenfeld
28W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Matthew Maycock
44W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Surinder Singh
61W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Simon Wu
28W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Theodros Dibabu
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Alvin Choy
60W–46L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Thomas Jardine
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Jeffrey Kim
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
David Taur
43W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Jack Mintz
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Antoine Reveillon
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Yueqi Li
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.