Teams

Sutton/40/4.0/WN/POTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 40 & Over - Women Night · 4.0 Shrev

20 players · average NTRP 3.92 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-30vs Rubben/40/4.0/WN/QTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMerritt Lorey / Shelly Valiulis vs Lacey McCollum / Sara Doughty4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrandy Hayse vs Samantha Bruscato6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeigh Ann Couvillon / Kristen Bernard vs Gina Bihm / Amy Bowman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-23vs Rubben/40/4.0/WN/QTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sutton / Amber Lewis vs Gina Bihm / Trish White7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanna Choi / Sapna Tank vs Amy Bowman / Laurie Oliphint6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Stratton / Jorie OBrien vs Laura Gooszen / Kyla Fulco7-6, 6-0
2025-02-09vs Rubben/40/4.0/WN/QTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesShelly Valiulis / Brandy Hayse vs Cindy Riley / Trish White6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesANUJA VELUVOLU / Alexis Green vs Kyla Fulco / Jennifer Hanson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLucy Young / Jeanna Choi vs Sandra Botzong / Lacey McCollum4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-02-02vs Rubben/40/4.0/WN/QTCWon 31
L#1 DoublesLeslie Stewart / Jorie OBrien vs Amy Bowman / Gina Bihm4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Stratton vs Jennifer Hanson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Sutton / Brandy Flurry vs Laura Gooszen / Samantha Bruscato6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeigh Ann Couvillon / Kristen Bernard vs Kyla Fulco / Stephanie Bass7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Brandy Hayse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.93
Lucy Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Maude MacK
published
3.76
Donna Bryan
published
3.73
Jennifer Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Alexis Green
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Jeanna Choi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Jorie OBrien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Kelly Stratton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Leigh Ann Couvillon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Kristen Bernard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Brandy Flurry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
ANUJA VELUVOLU
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Amber Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Catherine Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Sapna Tank
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Karen Easterling
published
Eloise Graf
published
Merritt Lorey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shelly Valiulis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Sutton + Brandy Flurry6165% games+0.2% vs expected
Sapna Tank + Jeanna Choi3350% games−6.7% vs expected
Catherine Reed + Sapna Tank404 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Green + ANUJA VELUVOLU213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Stratton + Lucy Young213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Stratton + Sapna Tank123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Stratton + Jeanna Choi303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Stratton + Brandy Hayse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandy Hayse
44W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Lucy Young
27W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Maude MacK
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Donna Bryan
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Jennifer Sutton
25W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Alexis Green
19W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Jeanna Choi
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jorie OBrien
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Kelly Stratton
56W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Leigh Ann Couvillon
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Kristen Bernard
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Brandy Flurry
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
ANUJA VELUVOLU
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Amber Lewis
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Catherine Reed
50W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.48
Sapna Tank
42W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Karen Easterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.36
Eloise Graf
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Merritt Lorey
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Valiulis
27W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.