Teams

BTA-C NAVY

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-31vs BRMST ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesReese Brammell / Jeremy Zaks vs Dennis Cave / Chris Rising5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHardy Ball vs Lenin Garcia6-1, 7-5
2026-08-17vs CVTA REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesGarrett Gregor / Christian Evans vs Paul Koob / Ryan Kinney6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesReese Brammell vs Stefan Caulfield4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCornelis Jan Stam / Tim Weinstein vs Richard Beard / Yashdeep Padey6-0, 6-3
2026-08-10vs LTA-Q GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesGarrett Gregor / Tim Weinstein vs Christopher Mayne / Wayne Huff6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristian Evans vs John Barberis6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCornelis Jan Stam / Hardy Ball vs Bill Chren / Alex Barberis6-2, 6-0
2026-08-03vs RCC GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesGarrett Gregor / Reese Brammell vs Owen Brumback / Jamie Sutton6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTim Weinstein vs Juan Sarti1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeremy Zaks / Hardy Ball vs Laurence Sones / Randall Else6-7, 2-6
2026-07-27vs TTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesCornelis Jan Stam / Christian Evans vs Ben Koch / Gerald Llorence7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHardy Ball vs John Gers6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesReese Brammell / Jeremy Zaks vs Damien Pham / Max Peninger6-2, 7-6
2026-07-20vs BRMST YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesHardy Ball / Tim Weinstein vs Greg Smith / Lyle Monzyk6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCornelis Jan Stam vs Kish Dill1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeremy Zaks / Christian Evans vs Chuck Smolky / Chad Young6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Garrett Gregor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Cornelis Jan Stam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Christian Evans
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.85
Reese Brammell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Tim Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Hardy Ball
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.72
Jeremy Zaks
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cornelis Jan Stam + Reese Brammell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Garrett Gregor
38W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
3
Cornelis Jan Stam
13W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Christian Evans
18W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Reese Brammell
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Tim Weinstein
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Hardy Ball
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Jeremy Zaks
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.