Teams

DGier (Queens)

2022 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Caroline Cox3-6, 3-6
2022-07-19vs EKennard/BDavis (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Laura Grant0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSpencer Stoakley vs Mary Gross1-6, 3-6
2022-07-12vs KAllen (Raintree)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Katrina Richards1-6, 1-6
2022-06-28vs BBaker (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Anna T Heath1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSally Licandro vs Anna Sison5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-21vs SCunningham (River Hills)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesDanielle Gier vs Brooke Stephens0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSpencer Stoakley vs Sarah Cunningham2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSally Licandro vs Sophie Karsch3-6, 2-6
2022-06-14vs LDiFazio (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDanielle Gier vs Colleen Cappello0-6, 3-6
2022-06-07vs SKopf (Raintree)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Sara Kopf6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSpencer Stoakley vs Susan Chandler5-7, 3-6
2022-05-31vs EKennard/BDavis (Park Road)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesDanielle Gier vs Marissa Kleber3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSally Licandro vs Laura Grant1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
2.95
Lauren Spanos
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.91
Sally Licandro
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Danielle Gier
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Spencer Stoakley
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Gier + Sally Licandro232548% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3
Lauren Spanos
35W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Sally Licandro
50W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Danielle Gier
44W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Spencer Stoakley
29W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.